MSPB
appellate procedures
Federal employees who make use of the Merit Systems
Protection Board (MSPB) should understand the MSPB appeals
process so that they can be sure that all of the appropriate
steps have been taken, and that all of their rights have been
honored.
Assignment of an Administrative Law Judge and the
Acknowledgement Order
If the MSPB has accepted a case for appeal, then it will
appoint an administrative law judge to the case. The MSPB
informs an appellant and the defending agency that it has
agreed to hear an appeal and that it has assigned an
administrative law judge to the matter by having the
administrative law judge send an Acknowledgement Order to the
appellant, the appellant’s attorney and the defending agency.
The agency will receive the Acknowledgement Order with a copy
of the appeal filed by the appellant.
The Acknowledgement Order will direct the agency to respond
to the appeal by explaining its reason for taking the personnel
action at issue and providing any supporting documentation. If
there are any questions about whether the appellant filed the
appeal within the legal time constraints or whether the issue
is within the MSPB’s appellate jurisdiction, then the
Acknowledgement Order will also request a statement and
documentation from the appellant on these issues.
After the administrative law judge has reviewed the parties’
responses to the Acknowledgement Order, the judge will inform
the parties of other notices and pleadings that must be filed.
The parties have the option to file their pleadings via an
online e-Appeal system or via regular mail, fax or hand
delivery.
Status Hearings, Hearings and Written
Records
In addition to the pleadings, most administrative law judges
will have one or more status hearings, also known as prehearing
conferences, to help the parties narrow down the issues that
need to be decided by the MSPB and encourage the parties to
settle their dispute, if possible.
If the dispute is not settled, then the administrative law
judge will proceed in one of two ways. The administrative law
judge may either have a formal hearing and issue a decision
after considering the evidence presented at the hearing, or the
judge can close the record and make a decision based on the
information contained in the written record.
The Initial Decision
The administrative law judge’s decision is known as the
initial decision. The initial decision must identify all issues
of fact and law, summarize the evidence presented by both
parties, and explain the administrative law judge’s conclusions
with a description of the legal authorities that the
administrative law judge used to make the decision.
Petition for Review and Appeal
After the administrative law judge’s initial decision has
been shared with the appellant and the agency, either party may
file a petition for review of the decision with the Clerk of
the Board. Three board members will hear the case and issue a
final decision. An appellant also has the option of forgoing
the petition for review, and filing an appeal of the
administrative law judge’s decision with the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
These procedures should be followed in every case. They are
designed to give MSPB appellants the opportunity to fairly
resolve their personnel issues with federal agencies. An
attorney with MSPB experience can help you understand these
procedures in greater detail and ensure that all of your rights
are protected.
|